Of course, one thing those conspiracies have in common is that they all came to light. And that is almost certain to be the case with any large plot like those imagined by conspiracy theorists. But a few documents remain classified, which is more than enough mystery to keep the conspiracy theories around the assassination alive.
JFK files: Here are the most interesting records on Kennedy assassination, annotated. More: JFK files: Withheld documents only encourage more conspiracy theories, expert says. The absence of evidence never got in the way of a good conspiracy theory. No matter how unlikely a given imagined conspiracy, and no matter how many facts are produced to disprove it, the true believers never budge. For example, even when Obama released his birth certificate many "birthers" were still certain he was not a natural-born American citizen. The fact that multitudes of horrified people witnessed the planes fly into the World Trade Center on Sept.
And what do you say to the people who still aren't convinced we went to the moon or that the Earth is flat? Social media is often the scapegoat for many of contemporary civilization's ills, but surprisingly there is not yet evidence it is increasing the number of conspiracy theory adherents.
A person who might have been handing out fliers on a street corner to get their ideas out in the past might have , followers on social media today, Oliver said. Irrational conspiracy theories can lead people to not vaccinate their children, to deny the scientific evidence of climate change or to dismiss mass shootings like the one at Sandy Hook Elementary as "false flag" operations meant to spur gun control. By pleasure we mean the absence of pain in the body and of trouble in the soul. It is not by an unbroken succession of drinking bouts and of revelry, not by sexual lust, nor the enjoyment of fish and other delicacies of a luxurious table, which produce a pleasant life; it is sober reasoning, searching out the grounds of every choice and avoidance, and banishing those beliefs through which the greatest tumults take possession of the soul.
Epicureanism rejects immortality. It believes in the soul, but suggests that the soul is mortal and material, just like the body. This quotation is often used today at humanist funerals. Epicureanism bases its ethics on a hedonistic set of values. In the most basic sense, Epicureans see pleasure as the purpose of life. Epicureanism divided pleasure into two broad categories: pleasures of the body and pleasures of the mind.
Download e-book Politics, Passion and Possession
The Epicureans further divided each of these types of pleasures into two categories: kinetic pleasure and katastematic pleasure. From this understanding, Epicureans concluded that the greatest pleasure a person could reach was the complete removal of all pain, both physical and mental. Epicurus distinguishes three kinds of desires: the natural and necessary, the natural but not necessary, and those that are neither natural or necessary. If one follows only natural and necessary desires, then, according to Epicurus, one would be able to reach aponia and ataraxia and thereby the highest form of happiness.
Epicurus was also an early thinker to develop the notion of justice as a social contract.
- Navigation menu.
- Collection Collective - Collection Collective: Rethinking Function, Ownership and Possession.
- Sag mal, wo wohnt die Omi jetzt?: Maria und die Spagat-Zwerge (German Edition).
He defined justice as an agreement made by people not to harm each other. Epicureanism incorporated a relatively full account of the social contract theory, and in part attempts to address issues with the society described in Plato 's Republic. Epicurean ideas on politics disagree with other philosophical traditions, namely the Stoic, Platonist and Aristotelian traditions.
No one is inherently of higher value or meant to dominate another. The avoidance or freedom from hardship and fear is ideal to the Epicureans. This community of virtuous friends would focus on internal affairs and justice.
However, Epicureanism is adaptable to circumstance as is the Epicurean approach to politics. In some situations it will be more beneficial to have a family and in other situations it will be more beneficial to participate in politics. It is ultimately up to the Epicurean to analyze their circumstance and take whatever action befits the situation. Epicureanism does not deny the existence of the gods; rather it denies their involvement in the world.
According to Epicureanism, the gods do not interfere with human lives or the rest of the universe in any way. Some scholars say that Epicureanism believes that the gods exist outside the mind as material objects the realist position , while others assert that the gods only exist in our minds as ideals the idealist position.
Rather, Epicurus is said to have viewed the gods as just idealized forms of the best human life,   and it is thought that the gods were emblematic of the life one should aspire towards. Long and David Sedley in their book, The Hellenistic Philosophers , in which the two argued in favor of the idealist position.
Epicureanism also offered arguments against the existence of the gods in the manner proposed by other belief systems. The Riddle of Epicurus , or Problem of evil , is a famous argument against the existence of an all-powerful and providential God or gods. As recorded by Lactantius :. God either wants to eliminate bad things and cannot, or can but does not want to, or neither wishes to nor can, or both wants to and can. If he wants to and cannot, then he is weak — and this does not apply to god.
If he can but does not want to, then he is spiteful — which is equally foreign to god's nature.
If he neither wants to nor can, he is both weak and spiteful, and so not a god. If he wants to and can, which is the only thing fitting for a god, where then do bad things come from? Or why does he not eliminate them? This type of trilemma argument God is omnipotent, God is good, but Evil exists was one favoured by the ancient Greek skeptics , and this argument may have been wrongly attributed to Epicurus by Lactantius, who, from his Christian perspective, regarded Epicurus as an atheist.
Glei , it is settled that the argument of theodicy is from an academical source which is not only not Epicurean, but even anti-Epicurean. Parallels may be drawn to Jainism and Buddhism , which similarly emphasize a lack of divine interference and aspects of its atomism. Epicureanism also resembles Buddhism in its temperateness, including the belief that great excess leads to great dissatisfaction. Epicurean physics held that the entire universe consisted of two things: matter and void. Epicurus holds that there must be an infinite supply of atoms, although only a finite number of types of atoms, as well as an infinite amount of void.
Megyn Kelly’s Interview With Alex Jones Sparks Controversy
Moreover, the sum of things is unlimited both by reason of the multitude of the atoms and the extent of the void. For if the void were infinite and bodies finite, the bodies would not have stayed anywhere but would have been dispersed in their course through the infinite void, not having any supports or counterchecks to send them back on their upward rebound.
Again, if the void were finite, the infinity of bodies would not have anywhere to be. Because of the infinite supply of atoms, there are an infinite amount of worlds, or cosmoi. Epicureanism states that atoms are unable to be broken down into any smaller parts, and Epicureans offered multiple arguments to support this position. Atoms are constantly moving in one of four different ways. Without the swerve, the atoms would never have interacted with each other, and simply continued to move downwards at the same speed. Epicurus also felt that the swerve was what accounted for humanity's free will.
Epicureans believed that senses also relied on atoms.
Yale Daily News
Every object was continually emitting particles from itself that would then interact with the observer. Epicurean philosophy employs an empirical epistemology. Since Epicureans thought that sensations could not deceive, sensations are the first and main criterion of truth for Epicureans.
For example, when one places a straight oar in the water, it appears bent. The Epicurean would argue that image of the oar, that is the atoms traveling from the oar to the observer's eyes, have been shifted and thus really do arrive at the observer's eyes in the shape of a bent oar.
An individual's preconceptions are his or her concepts of what things are, e.